COW/CALF
CORNER
The
Newsletter
From
the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
February
8, 2016
More feeder
cattle…but where are they?
Derrell S. Peel,
Oklahoma State University Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist
The
annual Cattle report estimated that total cattle inventories in the U.S. were
up 3.2 percent year over year at 92.0 million head. From various
inventories categories we can calculate an estimated supply of feeder cattle
outside of feedlots. For January 1, 2016, this estimate is 25.9 million
head, up 5.3 percent from one year ago. This is a 1.31 million head
increase in the estimated feeder supply. This compares to the 2.3 percent year
over year increase in the 2015 calf crop, up 780 thousand head. The ratio
of the estimated feeder supply to the 2015 calf crop is 75.5 percent, up
slightly from last year and indicates some increase in carryover of feeder
cattle from 2015 into 2016. That leads to the question of where those
cattle are.
In
general, the states that typically have large feeder supplies on January 1 got
bigger with these numbers. The exception was Texas, which has the largest
estimated feeder supply among states but was down 3.4 percent on January 1,
from one year ago. Other major feeder supply states, in rank order
including Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, California, Iowa and South
Dakota all have more than one million head of feeders and all increased from
2015 levels. Increased feeder supplies in those states accounted for 59
percent of the total increase in U.S. feeder supplies. Feeder supplies
were also up significantly in Colorado, Kentucky and Tennessee.
A
bit of a surprise was the sharp increase in feeder supplies in Montana,
typically a state with little carryover of feeder cattle through the
winter. The estimated feeder supply in Montana was up 139 thousand head,
resulting in the highest feeder supply in the state since 2010. The ratio
of feeder supply to calf crop in Montana, which has averaged 32 percent the
last ten years, is estimated at 37.2 percent for 2016. Additionally,
Montana, which typically has a small cattle on feed inventory, posted a 75
percent year over year increase in cattle on feed to the highest level since
2004. Similarly, South Dakota, the seventh largest cattle feeding state,
posted the highest January 1 on feed total in data back to 1965.
Missouri, though a small feedlot state, also posted the highest on-feed total
since 2000.
In
summary, the biggest increases in feeder supplies were in the Plains states
from South Dakota south through Oklahoma plus Colorado and Iowa. Kentucky and
Tennessee also had sharp increases in January 1 estimated feeder
supplies. Kansas stands out with notable increases in both feedlot
inventory and estimated feeder supplies. For several months there has
been concern that reduced feedlot placements was resulting in a buildup of
feeder supplies in the country. The estimated feeder supplies do indicate
some increase in carryover feeder cattle from 2015. Most of these are in
places that often have large supplies of stocker or backgrounding cattle but
also higher feeder and/or feedlot inventories in less typical places, such as Montana.
The
question of how many of those carryover feeder cattle are big feeders that will
need to be marketed soon in 2016 is less clear. The January 1 inventory
of steers over 500 pounds was up 4.4 percent. However, that total
includes the January 1 inventory of steers on feed which was up 3.1 percent.
Feedlot placements of cattle over 800 pounds has been up has been up 6.2
percent the last four months despite overall feedlot placements being down 4.7
percent over the period, compared to a year earlier. The implication is
that many of the big steers are already in feedlots. The 2016 estimated
feeder supply included a January 1 inventory of calves under 500 pounds that
was up 3.3 percent year over year. The overall implication is that, while
there are more feeder cattle on the ground in 2016, it does not appear that
immediately available supplies of heavy feeder cattle are likely to be
especially burdensome to feeder markets.
Oklahoma State University, in compliance with Title VI and VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 11246 as amended, Title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and
other federal laws and regulations, does not discriminate on the basis of race,
color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, or status as a veteran
in any of its policies, practices or procedures. This includes but is not
limited to admissions, employment, financial aid, and educational
services. References within this publication to any specific commercial
product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement by Oklahoma
Cooperative Extension Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment